A global crackdown on the poisonous pollutant mercury was agreed by Environment Ministers at the UN Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Governing Council on February 20, 2009.
A global crackdown on the poisonous pollutant mercury was agreed by Environment Ministers at the UN Environment Programme’s (UNEP) Governing Council on February 20, 2009.
The landmark decision, taken by over 140 countries, sets the stage for the lifting of a major health threat from the lives of hundreds of millions of people.
Mercury amalgam plays a large and dangerous role in small scale gold mining. Senegal. Photo by Blacksmith Institute. |
Governments unanimously decided to launch negotiations on an international mercury treaty to deal with world-wide emissions and discharges of a pollutant that threatens the health of millions, from fetuses and babies to small-scale gold miners and their families.
They also agreed that the risk to human health and the environment was so significant that accelerated action under a voluntary Global Mercury Partnership is needed whilst the treaty is being finalized.
The eight-point partnership plan includes:
Achim Steiner, UN Under-Secretary General and UNEP Executive Director, said: “UNEP has, for some seven years, coordinated and contributed to an intense scientific and policy debate on how best to deal with the issue of mercury. Today the world’s Environment Ministers, armed with the full facts and full choices, decided the time for talking was over—the time for action on this pollution is now.”
“Only a few weeks ago nations remained divided on how to deal with this major public health threat which touches everyone in every country of the world. Today we are united on the need for a legally binding instrument and immediate action towards a transition to a low-mercury world,” he said.
“I believe this will be a major, confidence-building boost for not only the chemicals and health agenda but right across the environmental challenges of our time -- from biodiversity loss to climate change”, said Mr. Steiner.
There are clear and positive links between decisions taken by Environment Ministers at the Governing Council and the ones to be taken later in the year at the crucial UN Climate Change Convention meeting in Copenhagen.
Some facts and figures on mercury:
Great white shark Increased consumption of shark causes public health concern among scientists. Photo Wikipedia |
- Scientists and the NGO Sharkproject are now also flagging yet another cause for concern—the increased consumption of shark meat in some parts of the world.
- By some estimates these foods contain up to 40 times more mercury than recommended food safety limits and perhaps a great deal more.
Cape fur seals. Seals have high mercury levels. Arctocephalus PusillusPusillus. Photo Wikipedia
- Mercury levels in Arctic ringed seals and beluga whales have increased by up to four times over the last 25 years in some areas of Canada and Greenland.
- Europe and the United States have in recent months backed export bans on mercury -- the European Union setting a date of 2011.
- Meanwhile, Governments in cooperation with UNEP have spotlighted a wide-range of products and processes which now have cost-effective, proven alternatives. The case for others is perhaps less clear cut at least for some manufacturers and economies. For example, high-intensity discharge lamps for use outside the automobile industry, some liquid crystal display units and certain kinds of plastics production.
- Artisanal and small-scale gold mining is perhaps a special case. The victims are among the poorest people in the world.
- An estimated 10 million miners and their families may be suffering in countries from Brazil and Venezuela to India, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe from poisoning or exposure.
- On the island of Mindanao, Philippines, 70 per cent of gold miners may have chronic mercury intoxication.
- There is evidence that far from declining, mercury pollution may be on the rise in part as a result of increased coal-burning in Asia.
Coal Powered Plants are a major source of mercury pollution. Big Bend Power Station in Apollo Beach, Florida. Photo: Wikipedia |
Arctic ice extent as of 2008 Image from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) |
The wider economic arguments are compelling. UNEP estimates that every kilogramme of mercury taken out of the environment can trigger up to $12,500 worth of social, environmental and human health benefits.
Contacts:
Nick Nuttall, UNEP Spokesperson
Office of the Executive Director
or
Anne-France White, Information Officer
The information in this article is from UNEP, 20 February 2009